88
88
May 16, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the perfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't of course necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at paragraph 26. you say, your own assessment, this is three lines down, is they have more influence on the terms of the debate than actual power to dictate policy. >> yeah. >> so the determine terms of the debate were into areas such as the culture of negativity and matters you've outlined elsewhere. >> it's also what's important. i mean, a news bulletin running order is a set of decisions that are made by executives. if a -- at the moment, pornography on the internet, for example. "the daily mail," very involved in a campaign. perfectly legitimate, serious issue. is that more likely to make the
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the perfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't of course necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at...
149
149
May 18, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 149
favorite 0
quote 0
good at marketing themselves, sor, fr example, the daily mail supports itself in the england, and "the guardian," a legitimate televencia, and i think that's a legitimate thing to do. but i don't think that's where their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say, and i don't think it's fenecessarily right. >> we don't necessarily have a view on a particular issue, particularly if it's a view of a particular issue, by this time the viewpoint is already being moved in a certain direction, not the direction the paper has taken. i'm looking at paragraph 26, mr. campbell. you say your own assessment -- and this is three lines down -- they have more influence on the terms of the debate than actual power to dictate policy. >> yeah. >> the terms of the debate were into areas such as culture of negativity which were outlined elsewhere. >> what's important, a news bulletin running order is a set of decisions that are made by executives. pornography on the internet, for example, "the daily mail" very involved in the campaign. perfectly legitimate, serious issue. is that mor
good at marketing themselves, sor, fr example, the daily mail supports itself in the england, and "the guardian," a legitimate televencia, and i think that's a legitimate thing to do. but i don't think that's where their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say, and i don't think it's fenecessarily right. >> we don't necessarily have a view on a particular issue, particularly if it's a view of a particular issue, by this time the viewpoint is...
206
206
May 16, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 206
favorite 0
quote 0
we've provided for you the piece in the guardian which you wrote in july of last year. it's under tab seven. >> yeah. >> you said the truth is, no issue of power to your principle was involved. we simply chose to be coward because we are too fearful to do otherwise. then he said, david cameron took up by the time tony blair and gordon brown left off. ignoring what happened after may 2010, would you agree with mandelson's view, we simply chose to be coward? >> i agree with it to some extent. i mean, he said there were no -- there was no issue of principle or priority. i think there were issues of principle and priority which i referred to a moment ago. but i do accept that part of the thinking of the prime minister and some of his colleagues was that to take on the whole of the press at the time when most of the public thought we got a pretty good deal was politically not very sensible. >> it might have been difficult to have approached this on a cross-party basis at any time between 1997 and certainly 201. unless you were to identify a short window of opportunity which
we've provided for you the piece in the guardian which you wrote in july of last year. it's under tab seven. >> yeah. >> you said the truth is, no issue of power to your principle was involved. we simply chose to be coward because we are too fearful to do otherwise. then he said, david cameron took up by the time tony blair and gordon brown left off. ignoring what happened after may 2010, would you agree with mandelson's view, we simply chose to be coward? >> i agree with it...
165
165
May 21, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 165
favorite 0
quote 0
the daily mail promotes itself as the voice of england, the guardian, the leb rahal intelligentsia, but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> i'm going to read -- if you have a view on a particular issues, particularly if it's -- at which point the viewpoint is already in a direction by the direction the paper has taken. you say your own assessment, this is three lines down that, they have more influence on the terms of the debate than actual power to dictate policy. >> yup. >> so the terms of the debate went into areas such as the culture of negativity and matters you've outlined elsewhere. >> it's also what's important, i mean, a news bulletin running order is a set of decisions that are made by executives. if a at the moment pornography on the internet, for example, involved in a campaign, perfectly legitimate, serious issue, is that more likely to make the politicians think that they might look at it, try to address it? yes. is there anything wrong w
the daily mail promotes itself as the voice of england, the guardian, the leb rahal intelligentsia, but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> i'm going to read -- if you have a view on a particular issues, particularly if it's -- at which point the viewpoint is already in a direction by the direction the paper has taken. you say your own assessment, this...
150
150
May 12, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 150
favorite 0
quote 0
cameron following the guardian hacking story in the 2011? >> i am sure we discussed it. >> did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international would mr. cameron at any time between the july 2009 guardians story and your departure from news international? >> yes i did. >> i wouldn't want you to say anything that bears on the current police investigation. in general terms, can you assist us as to the conversation? >> not very often, once or twice. because of the news of the phone hacking story, it was a constant that kept coming up. we would bring it up, but in the most general terms, we had a more specific conversation about it in 2010. and it was what i remember rather than general terms. >> if it is a general conversation then it may relate more to mr. cameron and then at me. >> it was nothing particularly that was from the public, but he was interested in the latest developments about him. i told him the same thing i tell everyone, it was due to the amount of civil cases coming in that in 2010. >> the context must be t
cameron following the guardian hacking story in the 2011? >> i am sure we discussed it. >> did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international would mr. cameron at any time between the july 2009 guardians story and your departure from news international? >> yes i did. >> i wouldn't want you to say anything that bears on the current police investigation. in general terms, can you assist us as to the conversation? >> not very often, once or...
191
191
May 14, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 191
favorite 0
quote 0
it still gets a reasonable amount of coverage in "the guardian puzzle -- guardian." >> january 2007, you resigned. whether discussions before the resignation? >> there was the conversation about my resignation. >> did you have conversations with mr. murdoch before you resigned? >> no. >> you concluded your severance agreement, described as a compromise agreement. the narrative starts at page 02379. we can see it is dated february 26, 2007. do you see that? >> yes. >> which i think is exactly a year to date -- i am sorry. a month after you resigned. >> i resigned two weeks before i actually left. the conversation i mentioned it took place two weeks before i left the building. >> you were not resigning on the basis that you would walk away from any benefit to might attain. you and thought you would lead eventually. >> it was my decision. there was not in negotiation or discussion about whether or not i would or would not. i was very clear that i was going to resign, and i did so. >> clause 3, you received both payment in lieu of the employers contractual. , and compensation for termina
it still gets a reasonable amount of coverage in "the guardian puzzle -- guardian." >> january 2007, you resigned. whether discussions before the resignation? >> there was the conversation about my resignation. >> did you have conversations with mr. murdoch before you resigned? >> no. >> you concluded your severance agreement, described as a compromise agreement. the narrative starts at page 02379. we can see it is dated february 26, 2007. do you see...
95
95
May 11, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 95
favorite 0
quote 0
and the kerry member when "the guardian," "the guardian" broke the story in july 2009, and it was a police bravery award, it is usually in july. so i don't want to absolutely rule out the fact that i may have mentioned it to him because he was often around, but i don't remember, sit down conversation where we discussed it at any light. >> so you're admitting of the possibility that -- >> i'm saying that it might quite probably have happened if the sequences of events, if my memory serves me well, and those are the sequence of events that "the guardian" story broke out in july 2009, but i can't member what date, and the police bravery awards were afterwards but it could've been the other way around. >> "the guardian" story was the fifth or six, wasn't it? the eighth. the meetings with mr. -- more frequent. what with the purpose of those meetings in your own words that? >> what they would often be attended come usually he would accompany a commissioner, on a particular senior officer, or if he came in on his own, it would be to discuss things with me and my crime editor and senior team, and
and the kerry member when "the guardian," "the guardian" broke the story in july 2009, and it was a police bravery award, it is usually in july. so i don't want to absolutely rule out the fact that i may have mentioned it to him because he was often around, but i don't remember, sit down conversation where we discussed it at any light. >> so you're admitting of the possibility that -- >> i'm saying that it might quite probably have happened if the sequences of...
192
192
May 11, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 192
favorite 0
quote 0
in other words, the story which came out of "the guardian" generated -- >> right. no, i don't think i did. have any direct contact. sorry. >> any other question which is a question in fact thought about asking but i will ask it now. did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international with mr. cameron at any time between july '09 guardian story and your departure from news international? >> yes, i did. >> now, i wouldn't want you to say anything which it bears on the current peace investigations, you understand. in other words, relates to anybody in particular in general terms can you assist us with the content of those discussions of? >> i think on occasion, you know, not very often, maybe once or twice, because of the news and because, you know, the phone hacking story was sort of a constant, it kept coming up. we would bring this up but in the most general terms. maybe in 2010 we had a more specific conversation about it, which i think it -- that's about right. >> can you tell us about that one? >> it was more, it was one i remember rather th
in other words, the story which came out of "the guardian" generated -- >> right. no, i don't think i did. have any direct contact. sorry. >> any other question which is a question in fact thought about asking but i will ask it now. did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international with mr. cameron at any time between july '09 guardian story and your departure from news international? >> yes, i did. >> now, i wouldn't want you to say...
63
63
May 25, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 63
favorite 0
quote 0
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the perfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't of course necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at paragraph 26. you say, your own assessment, this is three lines down, is they have more influence on the terms of the debate than actual power to dictate policy. >> yeah. >> so the determine terms of the debate were into areas such as the culture of negativity and matters you've outlined elsewhere. >> it's also what's important. i mean, a news bulletin running order is a set of decisions that are made by executives. if a -- at the moment, pornography on the internet, for example. "the daily mail," very involved in a campaign. perfectly legitimate, serious issue. is that more likely to make the
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the perfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't of course necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at...
188
188
May 12, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 188
favorite 0
quote 0
it still gets a reasonable amount of coverage in "the guardian puzzle -- guardian." >> january 2007, you resigned. whether discussions before the resignation? >> there was the conversation about my resignation. >> did you have conversations with mr. murdoch before you resigned? >> no. >> you conuded your severance agreement, described as a compromise agreement. the narrative starts at page 02379. we can see it is dated february 26, 2007. do you see that? >> yes. >> which i think is exactly a year to date -- i am sorry. a month after you resigned. >> i resigned two weeks before i actually left. the conversation i mentioned it took place two weeks before i left the building. >> you were not resigning on the basis that you would walk away from any benefit to might attain. you and thought you would lead eventually. >> it was my decision. there was not in negotiation or discussion about whether or not i would or would not. i was very clear that i was going to resign, and i did so. >> clause 3, you received both payment in lieu of the employers contractual. , and compensation for terminati
it still gets a reasonable amount of coverage in "the guardian puzzle -- guardian." >> january 2007, you resigned. whether discussions before the resignation? >> there was the conversation about my resignation. >> did you have conversations with mr. murdoch before you resigned? >> no. >> you conuded your severance agreement, described as a compromise agreement. the narrative starts at page 02379. we can see it is dated february 26, 2007. do you see that?...
155
155
May 21, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 155
favorite 0
quote 0
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the pfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't ofourse necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at paragraph 26. you say, your own assessment, this is three lines down, is they have more influence on the terms of the debate than actual power to dictate policy. >> yeah. >> so the determine terms of the debate were into areas such as the culture of negativity and matters you've outlined elsewhere. >> it's also what's important. i mean, a news bulletin running order is a set of decisions that are made by executives. if a -- at the moment, pornography on the internet, for example. "the daily mail," very involved in a campaign. perfectly legitimate, serious issue. is that more likely to make the po
"the guardian," the liberal intel gent yeah. that's the pfect thing for them to do. but i don't think that's in a sense where what you call their power necessarily comes from. i think it's a useful thing for them to say. i'm not sure it's necessarily right. >> a reader wouldn't ofourse necessarily have a view on a particular issue, especially of some complexity, until the agenda's set to describe, at which point opinion's moving in the direction the paper's taken. looking at...
158
158
May 2, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 158
favorite 0
quote 0
i would ask you to pursue that after. >> josh holliday from "the guardian." you are each newsgroup in the report to waive legal privilege. why do you think that would be significant and would you consider revisiting your conclusion if it is significant? >> well, we, i think it was a chance for the committee to persuade news corporation to withdraw privilege to the loose report. but possibly we also got -- after the evidence of rupert murdoch gave to levinson last week when he was specifically asked about this by justice leveson. and he seemed to attack burton & copeland in a statement way kind of lengthy executives for the cover-up. and there was this mumbled comment to do in the corporate and i think be really important that we just clear things up to it that report in 2006 i like is that there was wrongdoing, other than phone hacking, then it shows that there is a conscious -- consciousness of the company at the time and executives should have acted. i think it was too late for us to take a view on that. but you asked, i believe it was a unanimous view of t
i would ask you to pursue that after. >> josh holliday from "the guardian." you are each newsgroup in the report to waive legal privilege. why do you think that would be significant and would you consider revisiting your conclusion if it is significant? >> well, we, i think it was a chance for the committee to persuade news corporation to withdraw privilege to the loose report. but possibly we also got -- after the evidence of rupert murdoch gave to levinson last week when...
79
79
May 25, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 79
favorite 0
quote 0
in other words, the story which came out of "the guardian" generated -- >> right. no, i don't think i did. have any direct contact. sorry. >> any other question which is a question in fact thought about asking but i will ask it now. did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international with mr. cameron at any time between july '09 guardian story and your departure from news international? >> yes, i did. >> now, i wouldn't want you to say anything which it bears on the current peace investigations, you understand. in other words, relates to anybody in particular in general terms can you assist us with the content of those discussions of? >> i think on occasion, you know, not very often, maybe once or twice, because of the news and because, you know, the phone hacking story was sort of a constant, it kept coming up. we would bring this up but in the most general terms. maybe in 2010 we had a more specific conversation about it, which i think it -- that's about right. >> can you tell us about that one? >> it was more, it was one i remember rather th
in other words, the story which came out of "the guardian" generated -- >> right. no, i don't think i did. have any direct contact. sorry. >> any other question which is a question in fact thought about asking but i will ask it now. did you discuss the phone hacking allegations against news international with mr. cameron at any time between july '09 guardian story and your departure from news international? >> yes, i did. >> now, i wouldn't want you to say...
165
165
May 3, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 165
favorite 0
quote 0
"the new york times" have covered this a great deal, and they have worked with "the guardian." but this story has not been front and center in america and i think because so many americans view it as a british scandal. i believe it does have huge implications for america because rupert murdoch is an important presence here in america, with 27 fox broadcast licenses, and fox is of course a very pervasive and significant influence in american politics. the other thing i think is important to note that news corporation has many friends in congress, which may be part of the reason it's not, we're not hearing more from congress about this. they spread their political donations around widely, not just to republicans but democrats as well. i think making members of congress sit back and not want to take action unless they're going to be forced to. host: and to be fair, has fox been any different than cnn or nbc or abc or cbs? >> guest: it's hard to quantify, but i do think fox has done less coverage. one thing i think we are seeing now is it is finally some effort on american politici
"the new york times" have covered this a great deal, and they have worked with "the guardian." but this story has not been front and center in america and i think because so many americans view it as a british scandal. i believe it does have huge implications for america because rupert murdoch is an important presence here in america, with 27 fox broadcast licenses, and fox is of course a very pervasive and significant influence in american politics. the other thing i think...
154
154
May 16, 2012
05/12
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 154
favorite 0
quote 0
the official, and killed the grandmother in 2002 and left them without a guardian. a man broke into the room and raped the 12-year-old. they managedded to get release. the rapest, meanwhile, was sentenced to a mere five days in detention. within three years, she was sold as a bride to a man twice her age. her sisters were also sold by traffickers that have not been found as of today. when a german reporter and chinese volunteers found the father last november he told them that they turned them into a prostitute to earn income for him and beats her frequently and sold her body to bachelors in that area. she roamed the mountains for over a week, sometimes before returning to the house. remember, all of this was set into motion by the enforcement of the one child policy upon this family, and the lack of value assigned to girls and women in china. a second story is in last october. officials dragged her into a van. that's her picture. she was heavily present with her third child, died during the forced abortion procedure.ruct . the first criminal action in the investiga
the official, and killed the grandmother in 2002 and left them without a guardian. a man broke into the room and raped the 12-year-old. they managedded to get release. the rapest, meanwhile, was sentenced to a mere five days in detention. within three years, she was sold as a bride to a man twice her age. her sisters were also sold by traffickers that have not been found as of today. when a german reporter and chinese volunteers found the father last november he told them that they turned them...